100-gigab Ram

Court of Appeal Judge Gopal Sri Ram made a timely remark Wednesday:

"Oversensitivity to criticism will lead to intellectual ignorance or, even worse, intellectual arrogance."

He was sitting in an appeal against contempt. Along with Sri Ram were Judges Suriyadi Halim Omar and Abdul Hamid Embong; their decision was unanimous. The case in particular may be uneventful, but not the judge's remarks.

NST reports: ....adding that such (contempt) proceedings were a powerful weapon in the judicial armoury. As such, he (Sri Ram) said, only in the rarest of occasions should contempt action be taken as judges were not beyond criticism.

*****

On the very same day, the Cabinet closed the book on the controversial sacking of the three Supreme Court judges in 1988.

This despite expelled Lord President Salleh Abbas revealing five new facts about the episode a day earlier. Not teeny-weeny facts, but sup tulang-rich facts. Broth facts.

But hell, it wasn't good enough, according to de facto Law Minister Nazri Aziz. Good enough is only when at least one of the judges in the tribunal was to come forward and say he was instructed to find Salleh Abbas guilty. The Bar Council finds such logic puzzling, and its arguments are carried in TheSun.

Me, I'm drawn to a tinier subset of the whole thing; a little ghetto haiku revealing the inner workings of our higher-ups.

Singapore's ST reports: Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Nazri Aziz told The Straits Times that the episode would not be reopened.

"It was discussed in passing in Cabinet, and they agreed with me," he said.

In passing... just that, and who knows, perhaps a yawn.

I pick my nose in passing. I ask how the folks are doing in passing. In passing, I might pick up a pack of menglembu groundnuts at the gas station.

But I cannot - never, ever - discuss an alleged judicial crisis with fellow members of the highest law-making body in the country in passing.

Intellectual ignorance or intellectual arrogance?

Even in its emasculated state, the conscience of the Malaysian judiciary is way ahead of its executive brethren.

One would be forgiven for having the impression that perhaps the Cabinet is actually trying very hard, but only to live up to its vernacular meaning - i.e. a receptacle for empty vessels.