Friday, September 29, 2006

100-gigab Ram


Court of Appeal Judge Gopal Sri Ram made a timely remark Wednesday:

"Oversensitivity to criticism will lead to intellectual ignorance or, even worse, intellectual arrogance."

He was sitting in an appeal against contempt. Along with Sri Ram were Judges Suriyadi Halim Omar and Abdul Hamid Embong; their decision was unanimous. The case in particular may be uneventful, but not the judge's remarks.

NST reports: ....adding that such (contempt) proceedings were a powerful weapon in the judicial armoury. As such, he (Sri Ram) said, only in the rarest of occasions should contempt action be taken as judges were not beyond criticism.

*****

On the very same day, the Cabinet closed the book on the controversial sacking of the three Supreme Court judges in 1988.

This despite expelled Lord President Salleh Abbas revealing five new facts about the episode a day earlier. Not teeny-weeny facts, but sup tulang-rich facts. Broth facts.

But hell, it wasn't good enough, according to de facto Law Minister Nazri Aziz. Good enough is only when at least one of the judges in the tribunal was to come forward and say he was instructed to find Salleh Abbas guilty. The Bar Council finds such logic puzzling, and its arguments are carried in TheSun.

Me, I'm drawn to a tinier subset of the whole thing; a little ghetto haiku revealing the inner workings of our higher-ups.

Singapore's ST reports: Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Nazri Aziz told The Straits Times that the episode would not be reopened.

"It was discussed in passing in Cabinet, and they agreed with me," he said.

In passing... just that, and who knows, perhaps a yawn.

I pick my nose in passing. I ask how the folks are doing in passing. In passing, I might pick up a pack of menglembu groundnuts at the gas station.

But I cannot - never, ever - discuss an alleged judicial crisis with fellow members of the highest law-making body in the country in passing.

Intellectual ignorance or intellectual arrogance?

Even in its emasculated state, the conscience of the Malaysian judiciary is way ahead of its executive brethren.

One would be forgiven for having the impression that perhaps the Cabinet is actually trying very hard, but only to live up to its vernacular meaning - i.e. a receptacle for empty vessels.

Wednesday, September 27, 2006

Too much

Dang! For a moment there I thought BN's new headquarters was going to be built in JB.

Reports Bernama: A circus academy where Malaysians can learn the necessary skills to succeed as performing artistes, may be set up at Danga Bay here.

Sorry, tersilap.

A genuine case of habitually being forced to read between the lines.

Tuesday, September 26, 2006

What lies between chengal and merbau


Remember this picture? It was in The Star on Saturday. The people's leader, Samy Vellu, was on a ladder, flashlight in hand, poking his head through the ceiling finish of a classroom. He was doing a personal inspection, so the story goes.

So the story goes, the administration of SJK(C) Mah Hua in Kampung Selamat, Penang claimed that its RM100,000 bill for roof repairs was not justified. Works Minister Samy, peeved with all the allegations surrounding school repairs lately, decided to take time out from his very, very tight schedule to check the work out for himself. (I mean, he was too busy to meet Shahrir's Public Accounts Committee back during the CIQ/crooked platform compensation episode. Funny, priorities and time management.)

Said Samy: “I wanted to see the work done on this roof. I have asked the PWD to review the costs of this repair work, including the profits made by the contractor.”

“From my personal inspection, I find that some high quality cengal or merbau wood has been used,” he told reporters.

Chengal OR merbau, Samy?

Poor reporters. Taken for a ride again. There's a very good chance Showman Samy doesn't know his wood types, and was just rattling off to impress the kids.

See, chengal and merbau are two very different woods; different appearance, properties, and ultimately cost. You can tell them apart quite easily. There may be some tropical woods similar in appearance to chengal, but merbau ain't one of them.

Chengal has very tight grain, being among the densest of woods as it is, and is a dark dirty brown when aired. It's the colour of day-old coffee rings on your mug. Merbau is coarse, its grain easily visible. Merbau is orangey brown like kaya on your bread.

Structurally speaking, chengal is serious shit – under the Malaysian Timber Industry Board's strength grouping, chengal is king of the peninsular woods (rated SG1, the strongest). Plus it's tropics-ready, resistant to the rotting juices of many bugs and fungi. Which is why chengal was traditionally used in heavy outdoor construction – railroad sleepers, telephone poles, boats... you get the picture. Today, it is almost precious, mainly as an architectural timber exposed to the elements eg trellises, decks and porches. You'd better be rich to want to use chengal.

Merbau isn't as strong structurally. It's grouped under SG4 along with resak, another popular tropical wood. Merbau is pretty when milled and finished; the West and Japan use it as hardwood flooring. Rarely is it used as primary structure.

Why am I making a big deal of this?

I detest spin. Worse, I hate liers, thieves and the sorts. And lastly, nothing makes sense in the story so far.

Chengal, being a protected wood today and hence in limited supply, costs up to twice more than its nearest neighbour-in-strength balau. It probably costs up to four times more than merbau.

No architect or engineer worth his salt would specify chengal for basic roof trusses. It doesn't make economic sense. The RM100k budget would be laughable. Honestly, it's seldom even used in high-end bungalows. Similarly, I don't know of any architect/engineer who'd specify merbau for roof structure – as an SG4 timber, it's not quite there. It's deemed a pretty wood. (Roofers I know use kekatong or kempas, which are SG2 members.)

In fact, forget wood - light-gauge steel trusses would've been the way to go. They're cost-effective and happen to be the industry standard. They're termite-free, recyclable and more precise. Drive by any housing or commercial development, low-cost or high-end, and you'll see these steel frames up. Why didn't they use this ready technology?

Did JKR err in specifying an outdated product? Is this what's been happening in typical school repairs? You smell a rat? I do. The mind shudders at the possibilities from this little misadventure.

So Samy, chengal or merbau? For the more informed, that's like saying "titanium or tin". With your flashlight and your head poked into the roof cavity, could you really tell?

Or did you really not want to.

Thursday, September 14, 2006

The Boy from Clare St

I swear James Wong has the sharpest wit in the local political blogosphere. Two days in a row he's tickled me pink with his short deadpan entries while making lucid points. Too bad it may be over the top for some of those politicians.

I mean while Singapore's Mr Brown may be on another level altogether, the Clare St boy's got class. In a way, he's been my online local history teacher, coolly prodding me to reexamine beyond our propaganda-laced texts.

You're very okay, man.



Otherwise, been busy over at the other blog. Ogres been messing up our spaces.